Huh! I’ve never taken time to read an actual opinion before, but this was much spicier than I had assumed it would be! Very plainly calling out bad faith arguments and poor logic is not what I imagined the official majority opinion to be full of. I always figured the official opinion was dry legalese and the concurring opinions were where justice’s took the gloves off.
Huh! I’ve never taken time to read an actual opinion before, but this was much spicier than I had assumed it would be! Very plainly calling out bad faith arguments and poor logic is not what I imagined the official majority opinion to be full of. I always figured the official opinion was dry legalese and the concurring opinions were where justice’s took the gloves off.